News, Pleadings
David Nathanson
Public Trial Amicus Brief

On March 6, 2017, Attorney Wood and a team of attorneys from Ropes & Gray filed a brief in the Supreme Court on behalf of the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Weaver v. Massachusetts, No. 16-240. They argue that the Court should not shy away from vindicating the treasured right to a public trial. The government's argument that vindicating the right to a public trial would "open up the floodgates" is both factually incorrect and diverts attention from the real issue: whether our Constitution entitles everyone to a public trial. Read the brief here.

Gang Database

MACDL Conference Features Multiple Wood & Nathanson Attorneys

The 2022 conference of the Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers featured multiple Wood & Nathanson attorneys. MACDL’s newest board member, Senior Associate Melissa Ramos, made sure the event ran smoothly taking charge of logistics for MACDL’s largest substantive event of the year. Attorney Wood presented on gang databases as an unreliable and unconstitutional proxy for race. He also recruited many of the speakers. Attorney Jellison presented on the police use of “training and experience” as cover for racial profiling and lack of reasonable suspicion. Wood & Nathanson attorneys are consistently sought out to present at MACDL and other continuing legal education seminars.

,

Amicus Brief Against Racist Gang Databases

,

Attorney Wood recently consulted on and was a signatory (as MACDL’s representative) to an amicus brief in Commonwealth v. Sweeting-Bailey. This brief by a coalition of civil rights groups explains why gang databases are artificial racist constructs and unreliable indicators of criminal behavior. Therefore, the fact that someone has been placed in a gang database should not be a basis for reasonable suspicion that he or she has committed a crime. Read the brief here.